New Page 1
"Cleaning validation has a long-term
benefit"
Destin LeBlanc, expert in pharmaceutical and medical device cleaning
validation
Destin LeBlanc regularly trains FDA investigators on cleaning validation
issues. He has spent more than 25 years in the field of pharmaceutical cleaning
validation, and has written and lectured internationally on cleaning validation,
both as part of technical symposia as well as on-site company training. He holds
nine patents and has authored numerous articles including a book on cleaning
validation. During his first visit to India recently to share his experiences
with key personnel of the pharmaceutical industry on "Cleaning
Validation", he spoke to BioSpectrum. Excerpts of the interview:
You have interacted with the pharmaceutical industry in
India. Where do you think these companies stand in the area of cleaning
validation?
This is my first visit to India. Having said that, the Indian
players are in touch with me over e-mail. They are exposed to the global
scenario. They have the same kind of questions and concerns that were usually
being asked by the players where I teach in Europe and the US. It seems the same
level of interest exists among the players of India and players from the west.
What do you feel the Indian companies should focus on?
Some changes have occurred in India in the recent past. They
are on patent laws and changes in the regulatory system. With these, India is
now more a part of the international community. And it is going to be a level
playing field in one sense. Considering this, there should be more interaction,
inter change, cooperation with the group. This is going to be a positive for the
Indian pharmaceutical industry. Now there are going to be more relationships
with the multinationals and large pharmaceuticals in terms of being suppliers of
APIs and products. India has an edge as a low cost producer over Europe and the
US. But still quality is a concern. The best way to do this is to organize
training sessions on issues related to cleaning validation. The focus should be
on the most important, relevant things on priority basis, which add significant
values and really improve the quality of the product. Attention should be given
on proper utilization of the limited resources.
What is the relevance of cleaning validation in the
process of receiving US FDA approval?
In terms of getting US FDA approval, the way cleaning
validation works for the drug products is that if you have an NDA (new drug
application), you can get the approval without having the cleaning validation
completed. But you can't sell it or introduce it in the market until the
cleaning validation is completed. So it is critical for a company to get into
the market and take it to the patient. It helps the company in terms of making
profits and also the patient in terms of receiving a quality product. Besides
cleaning validation, there are a lot of other processes like manufacturing
process, bioequivalence studies which are essential for getting the US FDA
approval.
What inputs are the Indian companies looking at on
cleaning validation?
I think they are aware of all the issues in cleaning
validation. We have to do sampling and other things while doing cleaning
validation. But one of the things is a sort of balancing those and trying to set
all the things together. You can't spend a lot of time on doing this and
ignore the rest. You have to balance the efforts of both by sitting together for
the overall progress. You can't select an analytical message without
considering how to do the sampling. This ultimately has to be done in a
consensus manner.
What are the benefits a company can reap by adopting
cleaning validation?
I must say that cleaning validation can reduce the cost. By
doing cleaning validation properly and deciding it properly and talking about it
in advance, you can do it more efficiently. So you can do it and do justice to
your job. By that you are not wasting resources and can spend time properly
without compromising on quality. Cleaning validation shouldn't be part of
something that is necessary to save money.
Hopefully it is going to save money in long term because it
is going to prevent problems, recalls, contamination issues and lose. But it is
difficult to quantify in terms of resources and financial terms. However,
definitely it will have a long-term benefit for the companies.
Narayan Kulkarni
Page(s) 1 |